<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 5 - Version Numbering</title>
	<link>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/</link>
	<description>A podcast for the new Linux user</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Kenney</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/#comment-39</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/#comment-39</guid>
					<description>First, many thanks for the podcast. Great show.

May I also offer the fact that the fact that a Distro moves from one version to the next does not necessarily mean that the reason for thatis the correction of errors in the previous version.

Because the majority of computer users use an OS out of Redmond WA they see constant changes to that due to fixes and patches. It's my understanding that that occurs once per week minimum. A Linux Distro changing revisions mostly means the incorporation of new features and functions of the many packages used within the Distribution. Not fixes.

Let me use an example.

Mandrake (now Mandriva) Version 10.2 is actually quite a good and stable Distro. The fact that stable Mandriva is now at "2006.0" means that the newer version(s) does things in newer ways and in the minds of some folks maybe not better.

We/I use Mandriva 10.2 in one of our larger projects simply because that is a very good and stable OS platform. We continue to deliver our product using that OS and will continue to do so for years to come. We are not forced to "2006.x" because there is something fundamentally wrong with 10.2.

Bill Kenney
Linux User 277211</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, many thanks for the podcast. Great show.</p>
<p>May I also offer the fact that the fact that a Distro moves from one version to the next does not necessarily mean that the reason for thatis the correction of errors in the previous version.</p>
<p>Because the majority of computer users use an OS out of Redmond WA they see constant changes to that due to fixes and patches. It&#8217;s my understanding that that occurs once per week minimum. A Linux Distro changing revisions mostly means the incorporation of new features and functions of the many packages used within the Distribution. Not fixes.</p>
<p>Let me use an example.</p>
<p>Mandrake (now Mandriva) Version 10.2 is actually quite a good and stable Distro. The fact that stable Mandriva is now at &#8220;2006.0&#8243; means that the newer version(s) does things in newer ways and in the minds of some folks maybe not better.</p>
<p>We/I use Mandriva 10.2 in one of our larger projects simply because that is a very good and stable OS platform. We continue to deliver our product using that OS and will continue to do so for years to come. We are not forced to &#8220;2006.x&#8221; because there is something fundamentally wrong with 10.2.</p>
<p>Bill Kenney<br />
Linux User 277211
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: treehead</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/#comment-37</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/#comment-37</guid>
					<description>;love the opening-feedback-topic-wrapup-preview format.  stick with it.

;&lt;b&gt;treehead&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>;love the opening-feedback-topic-wrapup-preview format.  stick with it.</p>
<p>;<b>treehead</b>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Freddy</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/#comment-36</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/#comment-36</guid>
					<description>I'm surprised at how the various distros use a different numbering scheme. I know about the numbering of the kernel, but just the ubuntu numbering system surpised me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised at how the various distros use a different numbering scheme. I know about the numbering of the kernel, but just the ubuntu numbering system surpised me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BR</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/#comment-35</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linuxreality.com/podcast/episode-5-version-numbering/#comment-35</guid>
					<description>Just listened to this new episode and really enjoyed it.

You have a real gift for explaining things in an easy-to-understand way.  This podcast is a real gem.  Thank you very much for your hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just listened to this new episode and really enjoyed it.</p>
<p>You have a real gift for explaining things in an easy-to-understand way.  This podcast is a real gem.  Thank you very much for your hard work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
